1-23-12: Lead Paint Poisoning Judgment Overturned

January 23, 2012 at 8:10 am 1 comment

Last week, a Maryland appellate court ruled that Baltimore’s housing authority does not have to pay a $2.6 million judgment in a lead paint lawsuit.  Two siblings brought the claim against the city–they were exposed to lead paint as children when they lived in public housing.

The appellate judge said they waited too long to bring the suit. Those poisoned by lead paint generally have until age 21 to sue a private landlord, but the rules are different for local governments who act as landlords.

Sheilah walks through the decision–and the questions it left unanswered–with two lawyers: Brenda Blom, Professor of Law at the University of Maryland, and Saul Kerpelman, whose firm has tried a number of lead paint cases in Baltimore.

We asked the lawyer for the Baltimore City Housing authority to join us, but he was unable to make it. HABC has a press release in which it addresses the lead paint judgments.

HABC has refused to pay over $11 million in court judgments to Baltimoreans who claim they got lead poisoning from the city’s public housing. HABC executive director Paul Graziano testified in front of the Baltimore City Council that “HABC neither has the means nor the independent authority to pay the judgments.”

In August, Nathan Sterner talked to Baltimore Sun reporter Scott Calvert, who filed several detailed stories over the last year about the HABC lead poisoning judgments:

Payments for lead paint poisoning have also been an issue across the state in recent months. In November, we spoke with experts from all sides of the issue when the Maryland Court of Appeals handed down a ruling that changes a 1994 state law regulating how claims of children poisoned by lead-paint are handled in Maryland.

About these ads

Entry filed under: Community, Elections 2011, Law, On Air, Policy, Politics, Safety Net. Tags: , , , , .

1-23-12: Roomrunner 1-24-12: in (parentheses)

1 Comment Add your own

  • 1. Accident Attorneys New York City  |  April 17, 2012 at 4:51 pm

    How terrible that these people were not compensated for their ill health! Not that the settlement was even that much for the two of them to share after paying out their attorney. Hopefully they are dealing alright.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

Podcast! Miss an episode of Maryland Morning? Podcast it here.

Keep up to date with our RSS feed.

What’s on Our Twitter

  • An hour on autism: parenting, medicine, and the media ow.ly/vRIzi 1 day ago
  • Baker: "There are some actors who have disabilities, and it'd be nice to see them cast in some of these roles." live.str3am.com:2410/wypr 1 day ago
  • "Haddon's book is successful at taking us inside what it's like to have autism." Baker on "The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Nighttime" 1 day ago
  • Baker: "Mozart and the Whale is a different kind of movie. You have 2 people w/autism going through changes. It's a lot richer." 1 day ago
  • Baker: "It's very rare for someone w/autism to have...the kind of memory Dustin Hoffman's character has in Rain Man."... 1 day ago


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 70 other followers

%d bloggers like this: